14.6.12

A mediocre finale.

It’s been a varied semester, not just academically but also personally (don’t worry; I’m not initiating a deep-and-meaningful), and this is my final blog post. They grow up so quickly!

Turning eighteen yesterday, I feel I should bring a mature edge to my last post.

As if!

The best moments of JOUR1111 semester were, no doubt, realizing that my lecture friend arranged his jellybeans in the same manner I did, laughing just a bit too hard at crude advertisements, making more Pokémon doodles than lecture notes, and finally being able to just whine for a few pages and have it considered an excellent factual story.

After just one semester, different kids are already showing off what they’ve learned. The science students will tell you everything you didn’t want to know about your lunch, and the law students will tell you about every single piece of legislature they know of (brace yourselves). So what’s my by-product of being a journerd?

While I don’t always say it, I’m secretly judging people know when they talk about a news issue. I’m tempted to blurt out that they’re only thinking that because the media’s told them to, but generally people don’t appreciate being told they’re silly. And after the rap some of my law friends get, I don’t want to be one of those know-it-all students, so I generally just sit there looking a bit mischievous.

So this brings me to the end of my JOUR1111 course and blog. While overall it seems that the resounding message seems to be “you’re studying a degree for a dying trade, congrats!”, and my friends frequently tell me I’m in a dumb course and won’t get anything out of it (pretentious law chumps), I think it’s that underlying urge to just write that keeps us all going, much like this post. Hopefully we’ll all get there, or at least find some spiffy stories trying.

13.6.12

Tell your next of kin.

If there’s anything better than pranks, it’s Kins.

For someone who listens to music daily, I’m not into music. I don’t know my favourite genre and my favourite band is shunned by my peers, the music industry and I don’t think I’m exaggerating when I say the world.

And Kins is kind of the same. Its genre is a bit blurred, somewhere between indie, alternative and acoustic but kind of youthful and sad too, with elements of old-timey sea sides. If that’s hard to comprehend, which undoubtedly it is, just listen to them.

While I hail from the curb, they hail from Melbourne originally, although now they’re based in Brighton, so I’m surprised they ever manage to find a cab. While I liken them to a slower variety of San Cisco, they are not as well publicized despite my favourite track of theirs, United Fate, being the best morning-walk companion. And further still, it will take a decent Googler to find out that this track even exists.

Tentacoooool.

Since I started this blog, I have definitely changed tastes. Sure, I discovered I quite enjoy asparagus and octopus, but also style-wise. In an attempt to be the kind of chilled, sophisticated and relaxed person I will never be, I’ve recently approached fashion from a modern and minimal angle. 



 
 

 Le Specs sunglasses. ASOS REVIVE backpack. Lord & Berry lipgloss




Get foxed.

The arctic fox, while commonly remembered as a fluffy white beast, sheds its coat in the summer. While the white fur camouflages it nicely in the bitter and snowy winter months, its brown summer coat allows it to blend in better with the bare dirt. ‘Blue’ arctic foxes, however, remain dark or charcoal all year round and become just a tad lighter in winter. Like sluts and their fake tans.




I need something else to clean.

I was reading Oyster magazine today, and an interview with Julie Verhoeven and Something Else designer Natalie Wood particular piqued my interest. Verhoeven noted that she never stops making lists and “would be at a complete loss without one.” Wood also added that “full completion of my lists never happens; there is a definite roll-on effect.”

Hopefully this kind of intense list-making always means that you’re also creative and destined to become rich, because I never have less than three different lists on the go at any one point. Even just now, I have an incredibly comprehensive list of what I’m doing over the next month or so, what I’m wearing for said events, and what I have to bring. This same information is also in a different format on a list-making website, as well as some other tasks (it’s not uncommon for me to have 70+ items to complete). I don’t actually need any form of writing down because my brain’s constantly reminding me to bring my phone, wallet and some back-up lippy to that friend’s birthday dinner.

In fact, I probably spend an hour or so a day solely on making lists. Ironic, considering most of the tasks on these lists could be completed in the time I take to jot them down multiple times. My organizational skills must just be too good.

Anyway, being busy doesn’t mean a messy final product. In the case of Something Else, Wood’s frantic schedule and tendency to be disorganized doesn’t reflect in the collections. The A/W 12 collection, Metamorphosis, has me drooling. It’s fresh, modern and minimal but I know that the designers have gone through hair-tearing moments of stress like me to make it happen.





I think there is a part of everybody that enjoys a list though. I like to think of myself as Monica from FRIENDS – my military-style cleaning and desperate planning make me charming... sort of. I mean, who else prepares for the big one-eight by vacuuming their room?

2.6.12

Will blog for bucks.

At this week’s and my final JOUR1111 lecture, we learned about journalism in blogging in business. He told us that your blogging can turn into your own website, and you can turn that into your own business, which left me wondering why I hadn’t been paid yet.

Obviously and sadly for the reader I already know this, but right now blogging gives the creator the opportunity to pitch the story in any direction they want, and to control the story.

Thankfully for you, I’m a bit shy on Twitter, although the platform does allow you to talk to the people that make TV and as such, the news, allowing directly dialogue with writers and editors. Perhaps I should spread my wings and use it a bit more (bird pun intended).

It’s plain to see that at the moment that social media is where the news is. Twitter is noisy and Facebook is blooming, which means that using it can be classed as studying. And boy do I study hard.

1.6.12

Raf Simons says.



I’m lost in the fashion designer world. Sure, I like clothing and put great thought into what I’m wearing, but if you take me to a high end arcade and ask me if I’d prefer to browse at Costingtons or Overpricior, I would flee.

Basically, I know what designers exist and what are making it big at the moment, but I don’t want to. That whole sector freaks me out. I read articles about designers of the moment, realise what I’ve just looked at, drop the magazine, and run for the hills. I like the look of things in said magazines, but I wouldn’t have a clue how to put something nice like that together. I shop at Lowes for god’s sake.

That’s why Raf Simons is my god. I like minimalism in fashion because it is clean, modern, eternally in vogue, and it’s just bloody easy. Black or white, short or long. No ‘layering’ (curse the word), mullet skirts or hideous prints that not even Nan can pull off. And personally, I think it looks better than all these high heels with flames on the back and the oriental ‘trend’ (see, I’m in the loop. The dirty, frightening loop).

Raf Simons studied industrial design (he could have whipped up some of those snazzy chairs I’ve mentioned) but has worked as a fashion designer since 1995. The Belgian designer is strictly menswear, but that’s the appeal. It’s neat, sharp and will always cover your thighs.

Don’t let the minimalist approach fool you – his early shows were eccentric and alternative, allowing the models to run, and to wander around car parks and studios. In April this year, he became creative director at Dior, which is almost as swanky as Overpricior.

So while I’m still not 100% sure what area of journalism I want to enter, at least I know wherever I end up, hopefully, I’ll be sporting some Raf Simons. When all else fails, reach for the black blazer… and black shirt and black tie and black shorts and black bike pants  and black socks and black shoes. Ahhhhh.



Rad recliners and jocular judgements.

I first truly realised that I was an oddball when we did a book report task in grade 10. We could pick any book – any at all in the entire library – as long as it was non-fiction. It was a wimpy, non-graded task simply to fill in some time between assessments, but nothing was more exciting for a bunch of fifteen-year-old girls. My classmates all scurried to the fashion and women and Barbie section and had a few tiffs over who got to do a Powerpoint on Chanel, before they found out there were several copies and my teacher couldn’t give a rat’s arse if they did the same book. Meanwhile, four isles down, I had found my treasure trove. I grabbed the book, ran to my teacher and got the okay, and it was settled. I was doing a presentation on chairs.

But these weren’t your average chairs. I forget the book exactly, but it was hypermodern collection of designer chairs, from plastic neon green blobs to Perspex boxes you sat on. And while people slowly backed away from me when I told them the book I’d chosen, I had the last laugh – I was the only student in the whole grade to get a standing ovation for my Powerpoint. What can I say, kids get bored of speech after speech after speech on Chanel.

I liked that people couldn’t judge me on the chairs. If I’d picked a fashion book, people would critique the designer I’d chosen and, being pubescent girls, translated this directly to how cool I was and whether to gossip about me at lunch or not. But no one from any clique, be it the trolls, the offspring of Ascot mums, or the not-quite-a-full-cookie-jar crew, could judge me on my choice of chairs. Because none of them had a clue on what was hip in the chair world.

Despite this I knew I was chair savvy – my auntie had given me a giant Swedish furniture catalogue from some big shot home living designer, so I knew what was in and what was so last season in sitwear.

My basic message is this: that to be knowledgeable and trendy in a subject that no one really knows about, and to never use the word trendy, is a lot easier and fulfilling than busting your gut just to wear some Marc Jacobs. Intimidate your peers by telling them the latest trends in sofas, and ace that hollow assignment.

Coming clean... always clean... lovely and clean...

I’ve recently noticed that I’m a bit of a minimalism junky. This isn’t new – for months now my room has been entirely white, grey, silver, and impeccably clean, with a place for everything and every electrical cord. The layout is thought out, I’ve informed myself on clean, modern colour schemes, and invested the time to make it swish.

Though out? Informed? Invested? This sounds like a case of investigative journalism! Although Ross Coulthart pondered, “Isn’t all journalism investigative?”, this week’s JOUR1111 lecture clarified exactly what it is.

While my room has been described as creepily stark but somehow welcoming, investigative journalism is described as a method of discovering the truth using any medium – finding out what somebody somewhere wants to suppress. In my case, dust.

I don’t know if I have a talent for linking random subjects together or if my life is weirdly based on this course, but the cleaning of my room is a lot like I.J – critical and thorough and of a substantial effort.

I can draw a line though. While I’m one of the most pessimistic people you will ever meet on my off days, to be a great investigative journo you have to be skeptical, NOT cynical. Bollocks.

I still have a fighting chance though, as we were told that investigate journalism understands the hidden agendas of messages and doesn’t just act as a channel for them. I doubt everything, including media! The press lives by disclosure, so investigative journalists should take nothing for granted.

This week we were asked: what do many investigations have in common? They changed the world, and it is this in-depth reporting that actually reveals important news. We came to the conclusion that Wikileaks is not itself an investigation, as it’s just data – just stuff, meaningless until categorized, like the objects in my room. It needs journalists to go through and analyse it.

Investigation thrives on interaction, through interviews, observations, documents, and hell, if it comes to it, trespass and theft.  Yet it is threatened, oddly, by the online phenomenon and, not oddly, by the growth in PR. Investigative journalism could be big, but citizen journos are too afraid to put themselves out there. Nowadays if you look at someone the wrong way they’ll sue you, let alone if you reveal their shocking secrets.

We were asked what kind of journalists we wanted to be, and the furthest I could really go was to say I favoured print. Now I’m skeptical though. How am I to put anything out there without it being either drivel, or make me jail meat? I figure if I keep my work like my room – clean, emotionless, and dimly lit – it might be total crap but at least I won’t have a law suit on my hands. I hate formal wear.

26.5.12

Annotate this.

Greer, C. (2007). News media, victims and crime. In P. Davies et al (Eds.), Victims, crime and society (pp. 20-49). London: Sage Publications.

The chapter ‘News Media, Victims and Crime’ by Chris Greer from the book ‘Victims, Crime and Society’ outlines how news outlets select victims of crime to cover from certain criteria and news values, selecting which will be ‘newsworthy’. This chapter and the entire text itself are highly credible, referencing such outlets as the Oxford University Press and Journal of Criminal Justice to validate its claims. As Chris Greer has been specifically selected to construct this chapter, the content can be heavily relied on as he specialises in this area. This text describes the ‘ideal victim’ as one who is given the legitimate status of being an innocent victim, as influenced by class, race and ethnicity. This is true as the concept of ‘Missing White Woman Syndrome’ is present in the Courier Mail article, and the Westside News article stresses that she was a common mother. Greer notes that crime reporting is “highly selective” and that “violence is constructed [in the media] as ‘random’” or “the intentional acts of evil folk”. This is the case in the Courier Mail article, which puts forward the issue solely as a violent tragedy. While the ABC has also ‘selected’ the issue, the reporting is less constructed and more educational. News values of drama and violence are described by Greer and being newsworthy, which again is true for the Courier Mail article. He also notes that crime stories are “selected and ‘produced’… on the basis of visual and lexical-verbal potential.” The Westside News exploits such potential, including many images of Baden-Clay and using affecting language. ‘News Media, Victims and Crime’ highlights commercial media and effectively describes the behavior of news media, especially that of the Courier Mail and Westside News articles.



Crane, K. (2012, May 18). Hearts brake for Allison. The Courier Mail. Retrieved from http://www.couriermail.com.au/ipad/hearts-break-for-allison/story-fn6ck45n-1226359318441

This newspaper article outlines how the public has responded to the death of Brookfield mother Allison Baden-Clay. In this way, it is credible, as the author Kris Cane of the Courier Mail has acknowledged that a desired response for this type of journalism has been achieved. The author notes that the issue has “struck a chord with the public”, and includes dialogue from Police Commissioner Bob Atkinson describing that it is a case of “…significant public interest.” This response is attributed to the fact that Baden-Clay is “… a true victim.” Although the article has been sourced to an in-house reporter, the context means that the content is at risk of tabloidisation, due to the existing tragedy news value held by this newspaper. This does occur, as highly expressive language such as “tragic story”, “heartbreaking” and “…a tearful service” is utilized. This sways the audience to feel emotional as well, and in turn increase the public interest. The contradiction between recognizing the society’s response and manipulating it to generate further interest is common to tabloid newspapers such as the Courier Mail. Mediums such as television similarly exploit the public’s reaction. Conversely, it is evident that the ABC’s article ‘Police confirm body is missing Brisbane woman’ presents purely the facts with limited emotion, so as to inform but not position the audience.



Police confirm body is missing Brisbane woman. (2012, May 2). ABC News. Retrieved from http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-05-01/police-confirm-body-is-missing-brisbane-woman/3983398

This story illustrates the events of the Baden-Clay’s disappearance leading up to the discovery of her body. No specific author is recognised, but the ABC is a trusted news organisation for credible content, and the online medium means that any new updates can quickly be applied so that the information is correct. The article approaches the story from a strictly informative angle by using as few emotive terms as possible, with “…sparking a major search” being the most expressive phrase throughout. Initially, Baden-Clay is referred to as a “woman”, and not a “mother” as some tabloid publications have used, to minimise any emotional attachment the audience may form. The professionalism of the ABC paired with the online medium means that the information is presented in short, succinct sentences. Again, this means that only the facts are offered and eliminates unnecessary emotive language. Most of the content is credible, although the article notes that “… it was reported that a sim card had been found” but does not attribute any source. Despite this, the story is covered more professionally than most tabloid newspapers and commercial news television stations. When compared to the article ‘Unrelenting stream of tributes’ from Westside News, it is obvious that the level of reporting from the ABC’s story is much more information-focused, without an agenda to emotionally engage the audience.



Unrelenting stream of tributes. (2012, May 16). Westside News, p. 5.

This local story summarises the outcomes of Allison Baden-Clay’s death, mainly spotlighting the memorials that have been erected in her honour. No author is specified, and the source, Westside News, is not particularly credible due to its very local focus and the existing agenda to appeal to local audiences and maintain a readership. This article, rather than present new and significant developments on the issue, lingers on the memory of Baden-Clay. While mentioning the “tragic events” of the past weeks, it describes the location of her body’s discovery, where a small shrine of flowers now exists, as a “much more sombre location”. The article uses highly emotive terms to position the readership to view the publication as a family-focused, ‘loving’ local newspaper. It says that Baden-Clay’s “memory is destined to live on… long after the flowers have wilted” and, as opposed to the ABC’s strictly informative description of her, refers to her as a “much-loved mother”. While the content of the article is credible, the manner of its presentation is unnecessary to provide the information required and adheres to the medium’s tendency to glorify local events. In contrast, the Courier Mail article ‘Hearts brake for Allison’ uses similar language, but emphasises the tragedy rather than the legacy, and concedes that it is doing this.

16.5.12

Suspicion is on my agenda.

In our JOUR1111 lecture this week the idea that we were being told exactly what we like and what's good to like in the media was simply reinforced. In a bleak turn of events, I found out about agenda settings in journalism.

Reality bites. But these bites are socially constructed and mediated through shared language. That is, we simply perceive these bites! Very deep.

There are a few agendas in journalism. There's public agenda - what we, the public, perceive as important (keeping in mind this is also dictated for us). Then there's policy agenda, which the decision makers reckon are important, and corporate agenda, and finally media agenda. In a tangle of perception versus reality, these four agendas are interrelated.

Media isn't just (badly) reporting reality, they're also shaping and filtering it. Cheeky bastards.

In 1922 Walter Lippman proposed a theory - that public opinion is formulated from the creation of images of events in our mind. Propaganda and the power of images substitute on social pattern for another and we end up relying on images as opposed to critical thinking. Remember that birthday party you thought was awesome, with memories of fun slides and cake? But no one reminds you of how the bee stung you! That's how the media injects direct influence to set the agenda.

Agendas can manifest themselves in various forms. Media gate-cutting describes how individuals themselves control the flow of messages through a communication channel to expose it, and even these issues are often (surprise surprise) chosen by the media.

Agenda cutting is quite crafty, and not the awesome kind involving pipe cleaners and Clag. Not even close. While the media can't just blatantly lie (we assume), most of the truth isn't represented. Less coverage means that an issue is less cared about, which is the Beibs' claim to fame.

Then there's agenda surfing - the bandwagon effect. Personally I don't like wagons, but apparently existing public opinions do influence others towards that opinion. I still don't like wagons.

While media dependence can often mean an individual is more easily influenced, I'm stubborn enough that even my hours on Facebook and Twitter mean I'm always scoffing at what the news has to say.

So while my agenda involves cleaning my room, shopping for party supplies and redecorating my wall, media's agenda involves sneakily nudging you toward a certain opinion, quietly enough that you think it's your own.

So if you think my humour's tacky, you're being fooled. The world just WANTS you to think it's poor when really I'm a literary genius. Good day.

15.5.12

Loch Leporine.

While unicorns are nice, they're overdone.

Narwhals, they're different. Not many people know what their deal is, let alone what they are. Hell, I've even known a few delinquents who refused to believe they weren't a mythical beast and claimed that National Geographic's footage of their migration was a 'hoax' (it's okay, they go to Griffith now). 




And while they may sometimes be referred to as the 'unicorns of the sea', that impressive tusk isn't even on their head. They should be the rabbits of the sea, as it's one giant tooth, that protrudes through their upper lip and extends for up to few metres... a tad off-putting, but hey, they're kinda cute.

Sometimes it seems like whatever's roaming around on the land, there's a seaworthy equivalent. The landlubber cow has its dugong counterpart, lizards get large and lakey as crocodiles, and some scientists claim that even humans descended from an 'aquatic ape', hence our love and relative ease for swimming. I think I never received the swimming gene though.

So what's triggered all my evolutionary thinking all of a sudden? My notebook has a unicorn sticker on it. And while unicorns might not exist, the sticker also says I'm a "groovy chick", and that's certainly no lie.

My thrifty grandma would be shocked at such bad value.

My JOUR1111 lecture this week was of great value. Great news values, that is!

News values are the degree of prominence given to a story and the resulting attention given by the audience, and are often dictated and elected by media organisations. You don't really think sports and celebrities are interesting! It's all brainwashing! Unless that's what they want us to think....

Anyway, there are more news values and ways of organising them than you can poke an aerial at. Everything comes down to newsworthiness.

These values are even different across different services, countries and cultures. While the phrase, "if it bleeds, it leads" is true for some media outlets, with lead stories tending to be tragedies, TV channels like Ten and 9 take on the "if it's local, it leads" approach.

Harold Evans, editor of the Sunday Times from 1967 to 1981, stated in 2000 that editors are the 'human sieves' of torrent news. They ultimately determine the news values and what is newsworthy.

Drama, visual attractiveness, entertainment, brevity and other values are examples of such factors valued by different media. In 1996, Masterson came up with his own little dandy list:

1. Significance
2. Proximity
3. Conflict
4. Human interest
5. Novelty
6. Prominence

Seems fair enough? Duh-duh. In 2002 Macgregor reckoned he could top that and concocted another:

1. Visualness
2. Conflict
3. Emotion
4. Celebrification of the journalist

So which is right? THERE IS NO RIGHT ANSWER. How unfair is that? It's really got me worried for the Journalism Quiz.

And yet with all these values in place, newsworthiness is under threat more than ever. Journalism and the commercialization of media and social life, journalism and PR and the difference between ideals and reality of news reporting all jeopardise quality journalism. PR influence causes tabloidisation and lazy incompetent journalism. Then as the media apocalypse reaches its worst, hyper-commercialization sets in and as I've previously prophesised, we all get crap news.

So what actually drives the decisions made in media organisations about what is newsworthy? The audience is not just the audience any more. We're the distributors too and there's a new balance of power.

So let us join hands the cease this decline of journalism! If people from all over the world stand on a giant globe, join hands and sing, maybe things will miraculously get better. That's what we've been told before so it must be true and important.

When bananas aren't good taste.

I live my life by three strict rules:

1. Always wear a watch,
2. If it’s unreasonably stressful, avoid it, and
3. You CAN resist the chocolate slice.

In a totally unrelated matter thanks to a terrible segue, journalism and its behavior can be dictated by three ethical theories.

But first, to distinguish between ethics and taste. In my JOUR1111 lecture this week we were asked and often confuzzled about the difference, so I’ll put it simply.

In an advertising context, bad ethics is about making an ad that criticizes a certain demographic, be it race, gender, culture and so on. Bad taste is more about making an ad for fruit that, while encouraging you to get your daily two and five, closely resembles the male… anatomy. But it’s not an ethical issue to be advertising bananas and plums.

Now, these three theories are as follows:

1. Deontology,
2. Consequentialism (a.k.a. Teleology) and
3. Virtue.
Any ethical theory you can devise, no matter how broad or specific, will fit into one of these categories. Neat!

Deontology, personally, reminds me of dentistry. Firstly, the words look pretty similar and deontology sounds rather professional and toothy. There are other similarities, though, that my absent mind has managed to detect!

Tooth care’s pretty basic. Brush, rinse, floss, avoid sugar, and see your dentist. Follow these rules, you’ll do the right thing and have lovely pearly whites. Deontology is the same. It incorporates the rules, principles and duties of journalism, and as such all ethics codes. Do the right thing, to do the right thing.

Well there, I got to the point. No matter how many puns, analogies and bad images I conjured up along the way, I got the ‘right’ outcome. That’s how consequentialism operates. Never mind how we got there; the end may justify the means. Although nothing justifies my tacky 13-year-old-boy humour.

Maybe my courage is what matters – I’m brave enough to crack these jokes, and that in itself is a good habit of character. A virtue. Virtues are, according to the virtue theory, good habits that form the ‘golden mean’ of behavior and, as a result, ethical journalism.

As Neil from the Inbetweeners philosophised, “I’ve got effics,” and considering he’d find male genetalia made from fruit funny, it can’t be poor ethics.

26.4.12

My brain's evil plight.

Music blared in the background and the fan whirred faintly. My clothes were scattered quite artistically over the floor, hiding amongst piles of magazines, an unending network of electrical cords.

I lay limp on my bed, face pressed into my pillows, one leg dangling off the edge for the murderers under my bed to freely seize. That last statement isn’t entirely exaggeration. If it were dark, I wouldn’t have dared let any part of me protrude over the safety of the bed.

* * *

Everyone has a bit of a bonding moment over the threat of what goes bump in the night. I generally struggle to find others to empathise with my fears that there’s fire encircling the house, strange men in the roof and the walls, and, somewhere out there, giant skinned rabbits in business suits coming to cut me to pieces.

I’m not a loon, honestly. Every now and then, my brain just likes to chuck me a wildcard, seeing how I react to ominous voices in my head or visions of blood on my pretentiously named Goose Egg purple walls.

The 90s heydays saw me growing up happily, with a standard two-adults-two-kids-and-two-guinea-pigs family. Pretending to be a dog was my forte, and the most exciting time of the year was when we drove down to the beach for a week, to a 3-star unit with the childhood wonders of Nickelodeon, a pool, and an ancient videogame machine that played 8-bit Sonic the Hedgehog.

Despite my carefree adolescence, I always felt as if something menacing was looming somewhere, far away, but still there. It’s a challenge to explain, but I almost anticipated that these days of plastic food, Barney and dancing to Atomic Kitten were the peak of a mountain that was soon to experience many landslides.

Life moved on. Divorce can act as a slap in the face to some people, but my parents’ separation didn’t impact me severely. Even at the meek age of 11, I knew that my family was just one of those clans that operated better with some distance between them. It was probably the most composed break up in the history of life on Earth, with my mother and father peacefully informing me and my sister, who was 14 at the time, that Dad would be moving away. They never fought; my Dad was just lazy, a toxic addition to a family run by a female perfectionist.

High school was, in a word, tragic. I awkwardly slotted in with the water polo kids, after knowing one of them from primary school. Every lunch they would natter on about last week’s training and the sassy new school togs, and every lunch I would sit silently, smiling and nodding, pleading to the gods that they would never discover I was a lumbering rhinoceros in the water.

Eventually I splashed out, pun intended, and made the effort to find some other less aquatic friends. I shifted between groups slightly, and by Grade 10 I found a cluster of similar girls. School was slowly starting to reveal its tolerable side.

Meanwhile my brain, dormant until now, decided that things were getting boring. Happy, relaxed, and contented? Unacceptable. So the sneaky bastard searched through its decks and decided to deal me the depression card.

It came on slowly, and initially unknown even to me. People started getting harder to relate to, I was less compelled to show effort, and my mother seemed to become the devil. She couldn’t comprehend why I had developed into a wicked, hateful teen tyrant.

The forces of the world decided this wasn’t quite exciting enough, so on came the bullying. I still have no idea why, but I became the in joke not just to my all-girls grammar school, but to our brother school too. Bitchy boys will be bitchy boys?

People made private groups on Facebook with the sole purpose of posting photos of me and mocking them; at parties, complete strangers would chase me, yelling out how ‘dank’ I was. I didn’t dare tell anyone but a circle of trusted friends that any of this was happening, and even they sometimes refused to believe it, or didn’t understand the scale of what was occurring.

Eventually, this concoction of depression and oppression triggered my first ‘blip’, as Mum calls them. I escaped to my neighbour’s house late at night, and we walked around until a police car picked us up. Soon after I had my first counseling session. I hated it and, lucky me, there were dozens and dozens yet to come.

The bullying continued, I slumped further, and the pressures of Year 12 grew. I managed to struggle on, keeping up fairly high grades, and with a lengthy prescription of antidepressants, I held on to my sanity by a thread.

I wasn’t getting happier though. Depression is a strange and virtually impossible to understand unless you suffer from it. The common impression is that sufferers are ‘emo’, hate life, hate people, and devise ways to kill themselves every day. While I did my fair share of bawling, I wasn’t utterly sad, and I didn’t dye my hair black. My depression manifested itself as emptiness. I didn’t feel joyful, but I didn’t feel sad. I felt nothing; draining, numbing nothing. I wasn’t suicidal, and I didn’t self harm. To me, that would accomplish nothing. To me, nothing would accomplish anything. So I just sat through life, enduring pain after pain, and not wanting or bothering to do anything about it but wait for the end of the storm.

My brain was spinning in its chair, fluffy white cat in lap. What other tricks could it unleash? Again, it searched through its files and found another crafty maneuver: anxiety.

The bullies started to scare me. Before I had just hated them, every single disgusting cell of their bodies, but now I was genuinely afraid of them and would actively avoid their stares and callous words and any mention of them. I became stressed extremely often and easily. My grades slipped, as I acquired irrational fears of my textbooks and studying. Teachers stopped scolding me for sleeping every class, and started getting worried. I wasn’t lazy, I was very ill.

Once in English class, as my teacher was passing around worksheets, she saw me in a deep slumber on my desk. Rather than wake me, she delicately placed the sheet on top of me and moved on. She was probably one of my favourite and smartest teachers, and would later go on to advise me that, “Everyone has a shit year or two. A bloody corker. You’ve just had yours early on.” I didn’t know which was more exciting, hearing that things would get better, or hearing a teacher swear.

The tempest raged on. I developed other, less obvious symptoms. If my room was messy, I would feel jittery the whole day. If I left the house with the ‘wrong’ socks on, I would feel extremely agitated and self conscious, and usually break down with fear and exhaustion once home. I whole-heartedly believed that every stranger was critically judging me and did not like what they saw. Some were even secretly plotting amongst each other to physically harm me.

That evil brain was now cackling and rolling about, loving every minute of it. But the fun was yet to begin! It was time to crack out the big guns – a nice strong dose of thrilling psychosis.

One night when my friend was over. I was talking about a girl that had turned against me after I had declined emotionally, and doctors now think that taking about such a strong stressor was poisonous to my mind. Suddenly, just while we were talking, my friend wasn’t… him. I didn’t know who this stranger on my bed was or why he was weirdly staring at me. When he asked me what was wrong, why I shaking, and to stop, I grew more afraid. He was just a pawn in someone else’s game, here to convince me I was safe, while a greater force was looming (enter: evil bunnies in suits).

In a nutshell, I thought and saw some crazy shit that night and ended up in a hospital overnight, relaying my thoughts to doctor after doctor while fighting a strong sedative they’d given me. What moron thought to sedate me and then bombard me with a press conference, I don’t know.

These episodes were recurring. The one at school was quite exciting for all involved. My twitching, nonsensical babbling and involuntary swearing at the elderly school nurse was obviously drug withdrawal, according to my charming peers. The week after, was I at home recuperating? Rubbish! It’s clear I was in rehab and suspended. Reemerging at school, I felt like I’d risen again, and come back to haunt my cohort.

Having multiple mental illnesses isn’t fun, but I don’t like to whine about it. While I wouldn’t repeat it, not for a million puppies, it’s kind of part of me. It separates me from the common folk who don’t understand and who maybe never will. I have lost many friends who have become terrified of me and what they’ve witnessed, but the few who have stuck around are dependable, and have their P’s, which is handy.

It’s important to have a sense of humour with these things. Even my mother jokes about it occasionally. I see some killer shoes in a magazine and tell Mum that, “I desperately need some retail therapy!” she’ll retort with, “No, you just desperately need therapy.” I’ll pretend to be offended but we all have a bit of a chortle, and usually go shopping anyway.

I’m fairly sure I’m not barmy, and when I am, they’re just those ‘blips’, my mother assures me. Even so, some of the most creative people in history have been those with mental illnesses, and I sure used to come up with some creative ways to avoid violin practice.

People who are prescribed medications for depression, anxiety or psychosis will often have to take them for the rest of their life, but it’s impossible to tell who they are. Anyone you pass on the street could have prophesised their death last night and had to pop some pills to calm down. I know I have!

* * *

I slowly sat up, eyes fixated on my laptop screen and the words of wisdom I’d just churned out. My story might have been a tad gloomy and intimidating, but hot damn it was factual. With a mind like mine, swirling at a million miles an hour and uprooting most logical processes, it was difficult to think of anything to write about but myself. Saving my work, and sprawling back down onto the best mattress in the world, I cracked open a Simpsons comic. Not hugely productive, but still totally necessary. It was important for me not to get stressed, after all.

18.4.12

Feeling numb, numb, nu-nu-nu-numb?

Most people enjoy talking about themselves. To a person, their own name is the single sweetest word in the English language. I think that’s why I can sit down and churn out page after page of my own ‘factual story’, also known as a depressive look into my life, with a tackily humorous twist.

While I like the 90s for what they saw – Angry Beavers, Polly Pockets and reenacting A Bug’s Life with a few decorative rocks and some guinea pig seed – I think deep down, I’m fond of them because they were the most relaxing, carefree days of my life. And while everyone says that, it’s a bit extreme in my case, as my mind doesn’t allow me much down time between stressing about everything and concocting some fun new voices for me to hear.

Maybe again why I like grunge blogs. While they don’t promote mental illness, they don’t shun it. If you were to tell the owner of a Tumblr filled with orange tween girls with vans what you’ve hallucinated about, they’d probably cry. But not the grunge kids. We take what we’ve experienced, type it in a goopy font, and whack it on a pastel background for the world to take in. No nonsense, take it or leave it. WE R WHO WE R.


 Preach it, sista


 
And while Ke$ha’s catchy hit may seem similar to Lady Gaga’s Born This Way, people with mental illnesses often aren’t born with it. It’s their environments and stressors and the people they deal with. While there’s a slightly increased risk of developing depression or anxiety if your parents had it, you’re not ‘born that way’. After all, Ke$ha used to be fat.


Eat it, sista


I think it’s worthwhile taking the time to release your inner journo and write a factual story about yourself if you haven’t. Not a whingefest, just an anecdote. In my case, the added bonus of releasing my inner turmoil (terribly dramatic) was that I completed an assignment over a week early. There’s a first for everything!

16.4.12

The ABCs of public media.

‘To serve or engage a public’ – it sounds a bit like an entertaining policeman’s mantra, but it’s the purpose of public media as I learnt in my JOUR1111 lecture today. Thanks to public media, I used to be able to watch Move It Or Lose It on a weekday morning on Briz 31, now 31 Digital, all without being bombarded with ads for the latest amazing and expensive technological gadget for toddlers.

Comprising the ABC, SBS and their respective radios, public media in Australia is mostly taxpayer supported, although we all remember the scandal and we all wept deeply when SBS brought in ads (interrupted MythBusters, the beginning of the media apocalypse).

Back in the olden days when the world was sepia, public television required license fees from viewers, and so the public service ethos and value for the public is still embedded today.

The ABC was established as a ‘nation building project’, seen to reach far and deep into Australian minds; a bit creepy, but with good intentions.



 
I’m relevant!


SBS was the shiny multicultural channel, although all I really observe when flicking past it is its trademark sex between soccer. Yay for weird late night sexy hotline ads with terrible actors and equally terrible graphics!


 
 The kind of people you usually see on these ads.



Personally, I see the ABC as the place to go for sassy British comedies, Grand Designs to keep mother dearest happy, and Tony Jones, host of Q&A, the legendary guy that always looks incredibly smug as if he’s just told the most hilarious joke in existence.
           


“And then I said, whattsamatta you?!” *hold for applause*

A key mechanism that has lead to public media’s success is news. It’s cheap, people always want to watch it, and it’s generally not something commercial media goes out of their way for (doesn’t lure in the advertisers nearly as well as Jersey Shore, aw yeahhh).

Public media’s news is serious. It’s broadsheet. It’s important. It’s considered. And it sounds like a movie tagline.

Some might argue, however, that it’s boring, elitist, poorly presented and out of touch. Out of touch? That Pendulum remix of the ABC News theme was a hit with all the hip club kids!



 We're a trendy drum and bass band, and this, is the 7 o’clock news.


According to Rupert Murdoch (never a good start to a sentence), public media is just doing TOO well. Nothing more legitimate than Murdoch logic! Public media does have more… decent challenges to face, such as a demand to provide quality, be relevant, engage with the democratic process and be informative and independent. That’s a much stricter to-do list than my usual ‘paint nails, write blog post, feed guinea pig’.

It gets complex. For instance, the ABC – which is being funded by the government – is also responsible for being the watchdog of the government. Don’t sweat it though, this is a good thing! The ABC should be disliked by the government and sit above them so they can’t be ‘held for ransom’. I found it intriguing that the government was is against the ABC, and yet can’t do much about it because it’s held in ‘common’ by the people. Up with people!

ABC journalists are briefed to avoid political bias, and it’s important to remember not everything you’re told is true; Jeremy Paxman of the UK took it one step further, asking, “Why is this lying bastard lying to me?”

And as I struggle to wittily conclude this blog post, I pose a question for you: would you rather watch the ‘Gay-BC’, or countless ads for steam mops?